Malaysia-China
A win-win Relationship
China's one-belt one-road regional
economic expansion will shower abundant trade opportunities and development on
Malaysia's ports, railways and airports.
‘Belt and Road is impetus for world development’
By HO WAH FOON and THO XIN Yl
Sunday Star / 3 July 2016 / Focus
US$250b projects under
belt-road funds
THE Chinese government is putting in massive
efforts into its going-global strategy under its “one-belt one-road” regional
economic expansion initiative.
According to a PwC report released in
February, about US$250bil (RM1 trillion) in projects have been built, recentiy
started or have been agreed on and signed in relation to the belt and road
initiative.
PwC predicts that the three-year-old belt
and road initiative will mobilise up to US$1 trillion (RM4 trillion) of state
financing from the Chinese government in the next 10 years.
The belt-road initiative was first announced
in 2013 by Chinese President Xi Jinping. It aims at reviving the ancient silk
trade route and maritime trade route, and increase connectivity between Asian,
European and African continents.
This strategy will see Chinese corporations
building roads, railway lines, ports and infrastructure badly needed in many
parts of Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
It will also facilitate its own industries
to invest in these countries, and vise versa.
Together, the belt and road covers 65
countries populated by 4.4 billion people.
Alongside the initiative is the establishment
of China-sponsored Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and Silk Road Fund, to
finance belt-road linked projects.
In Malaysia, projects that appear to come
under the belt and road initiative include:
Malacca Gateway (RM40bil).
Edra Global Energy Bhd (US$2.3bil or
RM9.2bil).
US$1.7bil (RM6.8bil) investment in Bandar
Malaysia.
US$2bil (RM8bil) regional headquarters of
China CREC in Bandar Malaysia.
Deepening of Kuantan Port (US$2bil or
RM8bil).
China Railway Rolling Stock Corp (US$105mil
or RM420mil).
IT was a grim-faced Datuk Seri Liow Tiong
Lai who took over the reins of the Transport Ministry two years ago. The fair-
complexioned, well put together man hardly wore a smile then. But those days
are long gone. In his place stands a much happier man who talks animatedly and
brims with enthusiasm.
His appointment as Transport Minister in
June 2014 came with an inherited, highly unenviable task - he had to console
sobbing family members and answer incessant queries about the Beijing-bound
MH370 flight that mysteriously went missing on March 8 that year.
Barely had he warmed his seat when four
months later - on July 17 - Flight MH17 was shot down in eastern Ukraine, en
route to Kuala Lumpur from Amsterdam. All 298 people on board were killed while
Ukraine and pro-independence militia blamed each other for the downing of the
plane.
But with these two air disasters linked to
government-owned Malaysia Airlines gradually fading from the limelight, Liow -
also the president of MCA - is now able to turn his focus to his real
ministerial work.
Last Tuesday, he was his cheerful,
talkative self when he spoke passionately about what he has done to woo
multi-billion-dollar investments into Malaysia’s ports, railways and airports
under China’s one-belt one-road regional economic expansion, which will
ultimately translate into a surge in bilateral trade and investments.
“I don’t think we can achieve the original
bilateral trade target of US$160bil (RM640bil) next year due to the economic
slowdown. But with China’s investments under its belt-road initiative, we may
achieve this target in 2018 or 2019,” says Liow at the MCA headquarters in
Kuala Lumpur.
Currently, Malaysia is China’s third
largest trading partner in Asia, after Japan and South Korea. Total bilateral
trade for last year was estimated to be around US$106bil (RM424bil).
Liow says Malaysia is keen on fostering an
economic partnership with China as it is prepared to enter into a win-win
relationship, and provide transfer of technology and low-interest funding for
infrastructure projects.
China’s investments are both timely and
crucial for Malaysia amid the global economic slowdown and dwindling foreign
investments. Exports fell 17.2% year on year in the first quarter of this year,
due partly to the sluggish demand for commodities.
Against this backdrop, the 55-year-old
energetic minister has been making frequent trips to Beijing to entice more
direct investments into the country. If he succeeds, it could mean tens of
billions of new investments for Malaysia.
Last month’s trip to Beijing saw him
inking an extension to the port alliance agreement with China, a deal that
carries wide-ranging business implications for Malaysian ports and associated
stakeholders. A top officer of MMC Corporation Bhd, a utilities and
infrastructure group with interests in
ports and logistics, was spotted in China with him.
As 80% of the world’s East-West maritime
trade passes through the Straits of Malacca, Liow has proposed that China build
a third deep-sea port at Carey Island in Port Klang to service these ships.
Port Klang is the world’s 12th busiest
container port now. Its container cargo handling volume is projected to hit
16.3 million TEUs in 2020 - nearing its capacity. Hence, expansion plans for
Port Klang are needed now.
Liow says he has also asked China to
re-look the Port Klang Free Trade Zone (PKFZ), once tarnished by mismanagement,
cost overruns and a land deal scandal. The Chinese came once before PKFZ was
revamped.
“With lots of Chinese investments, PKFZ
has become a very crucial area to develop our ports. The Chinese are interested
to use PKFZ to transfer goods for export and import into the region. We are
working with China Merchants Group (CMG) on this,” he said in an interview with
Sunday Star.
CMG is a state-owned conglomerate based in
Hong Kong, with transportation and property development as two of its core
businesses. The highly profitable company with total assets of 976.7 billion
yuan (RM587bil) is described on its website as a major player in the
transportation infrastructure industry. It owns 30 ports in 16 countries.
Without referring to written answers, Liow
talks excitedly non-stop for one hour
on how Malaysia is reaping benefits from
the belt-road investments. Below are the excerpts:
What local infrastructure projects will
benefit from China’s Belt and Road initiative?
We are focusing on trade. From 2009 till
now, we are China’s number one trading partner in Asean. In 2014, our two-way
trade exceeded US$100bil (RM400bil). This initiative means a lot to Malaysia
because we want to enhance trade with China. We have put in place a lot of
projects to increase trade.
For example, we have the sister industrial
parks in Qinzhou, Guangxi province and Kuantan, Pahang, to create investments
for both countries. We have Iskandar Malaysia to attract Chinese investment to
property and mixed development projects. We also focus on infrastructure, such
as the railway line, which is of great interest to China. In addition, we have
lots of ports to work with China.
Malacca and Guangdong have established a
“friendly state and province” status. Chinese provinces have to achieve trade
KPIs, which is why Malacca can achieve results very fast. China Southern
Airlines will be making its maiden flight from Guangzhou to Malacca in
September. This is major news for Malacca, as few international flights use its
airport.
All these can happen because of the Belt
and Road initiative. We have put forward lots of programmes for China,
including pick and choose. In fact, they want most
of them.
Why is Malaysia keen on China?
We want China to not only take our
projects, but also bring in soft loans and technology transfer. That is why we
work with them.
If China is interested in our railway
projects, such as the East Coast line from Tumpat (in Kelantan) to Kuala
Lumpur, they can come up with packages that include financing and technology
transfer. If beneficial to Malaysia, we can take up their offers.
The Kuala Lumpur-Singapore High Speed Rail
(HSR), currently estimated to cost
RM60bil, is another important project.
Has China indicated any soft loan for this
RM60bil project?
No, because we have yet to call for
tenders. When we do next year, we will see who offers the best. We really hope
China can come up with not only financing, but also transit-oriented
development projects to help develop cities and towns along the HSR.
You have indicated that you are very
impressed with China’s rail technology. What about Singapore’s?
China has managed to take the best from
others and innovate the best. They take the best from Bombardier, Siemens and
technologies from Italy and Europe. They innovate - but not copy - from the
best and produce their own rail technology.
But it is also important for us to look at
the life cycle cost. We can’t just look at cost per se. The life cycle cost -
which covers maintenance for the whole project - is also vital. We have to
compare the Chinese costs with other countries too.
We don’t have any comments from Singapore
yet. But we have been invited by the South Korean, Japanese and Chinese
governments to visit their HSR projects.
I visited Japan and China, so we are able
to make some comparisons. We want to look at the overall picture. It is too
early to judge now.
So there’s no guarantee that China will
get the job?
Nobody can guarantee anything now because
the terms of reference are not up yet, the specifications are not drawn up. And
nobody can say anything now. Japan and China cannot say they are sure they will
get the project. We should be fair to all because this is an international
tender.
What’s your conclusion after seeing the
HSR technologies in Japan and China?
Well, I should not be too open about my
comments because I am part of this very important project. The country also
wants to look for the best. We have regular economic council meetings on the
HSR. I reserve my comments.
What kinds of business opportunities will
our companies benefit from under these projects?
There are a lot of benefits under the
whole Belt and Road initiative.
Firstly, we are able to initiate the
projects faster as China responds quickly to our calls. For example, when we
tried to form a port alliance among six Malaysian ports and 10 Chinese ports
last year, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang responded and witnessed the MoU signing
ceremony between the transport ministries of both countries.
That shows that government commitment is
very, very high.
Secondly, you can see that all giant companies
- China Merchants, China Shipping and other ship liners have come to Malaysia
to see our ports. This has created a lot of excitement.
Because of this port alliance, ship liners
are coming up with proposals to expedite and enhance trade between ports.
China’s Transport Ministry wants this
project to be implemented fast, so in mid- July, there will be a forum in
Ningbo, Zhejiang province, to discuss the activities under the port alliance.
We are going to have a convention of ports once a year, and alternate the venue
between China and Malaysia.
Under the extension agreement signed
recently, we are opening up membership to more ports, port operators, ship
liners, freight forwarders and logistic companies. All stakeholders will
benefit from this. It will definitely enhance trade between our ports.
Under the MoU, we are talking about port
study, training and apprenticeship, exchange of information, technical
assistance, traffic development and promotion of services. I have proposed more
areas of mutual cooperation.
Will the extension of this port alliance
help to achieve the bilateral trade target of US$160bil (RM640bil>?
Yes. We can’t achieve the goal in 2017 but
maybe a little later - 2018 to 2019.
Will it help to achieve your trade target
for Port Klang?
Our target is to also enable Port Klang to
handle up to 30 million TEUs.
We can easily handle 16 million TEUs now
but we have to plan for a 30-million- TEU capacity. We cannot wait too long.
I am trying to improve our port logistics
and infrastructure: the customs system to remove the bottleneck and reduce
paperwork by using technology to speed up trade at ports.
We are also looking at developing a third
port called Carey Island, in addition to Westport and Northport. We will see if
China is interested to develop this.
How will our airports benefit from China’s
Belt and Road initiative?
Because of e-commerce, air cargo has
become an important growth sector in Malaysia. That’s why KLIA is also focusing
on air cargo development.
I recently launched the KLIA Aeropolis to
turn KLIA into a cargo hub. A lot of parties are interested to fly into KLIA
for air cargo. DHL is already in and so are many local air cargo companies. We
are trying to attract air cargo companies from China to come in.
There should not be any problem to get
investors to come into this sector.
What is the impact of the Belt and Road
initiative on our economy?
The Malaysian and Chinese economies are
closely linked. (About 20% of Malaysian exports go to China). If China’s economy
drops by 1%, our economy will be affected by 0.4%.
We are very worried when China slows down,
but we are glad that it is experiencing non-stop growth although its
double-digit growth dropped to 6.9% last year.
Its GDP goal for this year is 6.5%. We can
still maintain our economic growth of 4% to 4.5% should China achieve a 6.5%
growth.
The ultimate goal of this Belt and Road
initiative is connectivity through infrastructure development. It brings
Malaysia and Asean closer to China. When people from both sides are closer,
there will be more economic opportunities.
Take the Kunming-Singapore transnational
railway link for example. We have wanted to push for it since 1995 but only
recendy we saw real development of the link.
Before this, there were concerns of
shortage of funds and of the rail link becoming a white elephant. But as soon
as China pledged its support, Thailand immediately committed to building a
railway from China to Bangkok. Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos all began to push for
their rail projects.
Without China to spearhead this plan, it
will need another 10 to 20 years for the project to come to fruition. I
strongly believe that the Belt and Road is the impetus for development in the
world.
Does China impose conditions on Belt- Road
projects in Malaysia since it is funding many projects?
Malaysia will impose our conditions on local
content. Normally when they invest here, we set our own rules and regulations.
Not theirs. They will follow our requirements even if funding comes from them.
In fact, we are offering good projects to
them, For example, we offered sea-fronting land for the Malacca Gateway
project. They are using our local contractors and suppliers. There are no
conditions to say that everything must be imported from China. There are no
such requests too.
There is overcapacity in China, so they
need to export this overcapacity?
Maybe this applies to African countries,
but not for Malaysia. We are not an underdeveloped country but a developing
country with our own expertise. We have the technology to build our own railway
lines.
But because of our good relationship with
China and the lower costs it can offer, it’s a win-win pact for us. It’s never
a one-sided agreement. It has to be a win-win situation for us.
China is seen as expanding its power and
influence through the Belt and Road initiative. What’s your take on this?
I don’t think so. China is very keen to
enhance trade with Malaysia and Asean. Asean, as a group, is a big market now
and Malaysia is in the centre of Asean. Asean is now the seventh biggest
economy in the world and it can jump to fourth place in years to come.
Malaysia has good infrastructure, a good
legal system and a stable government, which is why we can attract the Chinese
to come.
As a group, Asean has its own territory
and boundary. We have our own stance on the South China Sea issue. The Asean
position is very clear and China knows it.
We are putting trade as our priority.
Whatever disagreements can be further negotiated and discussed in a cordial
environment.
South China Sea is definitely an issue for
Asean but it will not be a hindrance to the Malaysia-China good relationship.
It won’t be a stumbling block. As of now, we need China and China needs us, in
terms of economic development.
No comments:
Post a Comment