KOTA KINABALU, Sept 16 ― Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak today
urged Sabah and Sarawak to do away with their regional sentiments and assured
the two east Malaysian states that they will get their rights as enshrined in
the Malaysia Agreement 1963 in due course.
In his Malaysia Day speech here, Najib said negotiations by the Special
Rights Cabinet committee will be done in a civil manner “as siblings”, and
there was no need for calls of “Sabah for Sabahans” or “Sarawak for
Sarawakians”.
“We want Sabahans for Malaysia and Malaysians for Sabahans. We will make
sure they get what they are due soon. This is what it means to be family,” he
said.
He said that the federal government will address the development gap
between Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak and bring the latter two on
the same level. On this, he said the Pan Borneo highway would go a long way to
increasing the socio economic situation here.
“I will give special attention to Sabah’s rural areas to ensure they
have more basic infrastructure because we are aware this is much needed,” he
said, adding that the government has arranged for a special subsidy by Petronas
worth RM330 million, effectively reducing the electricity tariff for Sabah and
Labuan.
“Thus, Sabahans shouldn’t be cheated by opposition claims. We are
looking out for Sabah,” he said.
On criticism of the Employees’ Provident Fund’s planned additional US$4
billion (RM17 billion) in the US, Najib said it was his plan to diversify the
EPF’s RM760 billion funds in different investments.
“When I was facing the US president, I showed him what I think are value
propositions. We want to buy those Boeing planes and Dreamliners, not to give
them profit as what the opposition claims, but to revive Malaysia Airlines.
“We want MAS to have the best aircrafts. We cannot fly with old and
aging aircrafts. We want the best for our airlines so we can bring more
tourists here,” he said.
“Why should KWSP invest all of its RM760 billion in the Kuala Lumpur
Stock Exchange alone? They should have varied investments that’s why we have
investments in 39 countries so we can give out profitable dividends,” he said.
Najib earlier said that US president Donald Trump had invited him to
extend his trip in the US but he had declined, saying he had to attend the
Malaysia Day celebrations here, which was a very meaningful day for Malaysians.
The 54th Malaysian birthday celebrations at the Likas Sports Complex
parking lot began yesterday with several events and stage performances by local
and national artists.
Also present at the event was State Yang Di Pertua Negeri Tun Juhar
Mahiruddin, deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Chief Minister
Tan Sri Musa Aman and Sarawak State speaker Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang
Nasar.
Earlier, Musa praised Najib for his leadership and for putting Malaysia
on the international stage as a progressive modern Muslim country with his
recent visits to the US and United Kingdom.
He said that Najib’s trip the US White House at the invitation of US
president Donald Trump reflected Malaysia’s role as a strategic partner to the
latter.
“Malaysia is committed to fight violence and oppression, not as what the
foreign media are reporting and the claims of the opposition to tarnish our
nation’s image,” he said, adding that foreign media was colluding with certain
opposition leaders to tarnish the nation.
Stick to Sovereign Symbols
Posted on 13 September 2017 -
09:22am
Dzulkifli Abdul
Razak
HARI Malaysia
has a new "icon" (read logo), a relaunch of a previous one allegedly
"to avoid confusion among the people". How so is vague because a logo
is merely a representation that could be made to mean practically anything as
long as it is clearly defined for a particular purpose.
At one point our
sovereign insignias: Jalur Gemilang, Negaraku and
the national emblem with the motto "Bersekutu Bertambah Mutu"
(remember?), were more than ample to give the very meaning we are seeking for
without the aid of any fashionable logo. The latter tendency suggests that the
sovereign symbols are "weakening" and need to be propped up despite
inherently being all about 1Malaysia sehati sejiwa – to use the cliché.
Could it be that
the "confusion" is in the "mind", which needs fine-tuning
rather than the logo? It may well be given the many "new" normals
emerging that are clouding what was once crystal clear. Still the potentially "confusing"
logo has been in the public domain since 2009, long enough without any hint
that it is "problematic". Credible evidence to prove otherwise is
also wanting.
Over the last two
decades many logos have been introduced that still beg similar questions. They
are generally short-lived, have an uncertain impact and cost aplenty.
Let us start with
the Rakan Muda programme unveiled in 1994 with a myriad of logos touted to
change the youthful lifestyles to something positive. Calibrating this with the
general state of affairs today, involving our youth in particular, it raises
doubts as to its effectiveness. Now that those logos have virtually
disappeared, does it mean that they are firmly internalised such that their
display is redundant? Or have they failed as indicated by the worrying trend
among youth? What impact has the Rakan Muda programmes brought to renew our
thinking today? Despite claims that the programme had been relaunched in 2008,
the situation remains dire.
A case in point,
there is nothing more dire than the addictive smoking habit among our youth.
Dubbed as a gateway to the use of hard drugs, smoking has worsened over the
years. This is despite an earnest effort to counter this trend through a RM100
million anti-smoking campaign between 2004 and 2009 with another corporate
designed logo to boot. Known as Tak Nak, the campaign was reportedly deemed a
"failure" by the then minister of health. The slogan reappeared more
recently with its logo tweaked. But failed again in face of the
"vaping" onslaught that took the smoker's world by storm.
It is apparent
that the logo has little impact to drastically check, if not, reduce tobacco
abuse, especially among the younger age group.
Extrapolate these
miseries to the purported logo relaunch, the storyline and outcomes are similar
indicating that the inherent failures in thinking are still there. Hence having
to tweak the logo raised more questions than answers. Juxtaposed against the
money spent, it is tempting to ask what have we learnt from Tak Nak and Rakan
Muda, especially when there are other (cheaper, more effective) options widely
available but not duly explored.
Can the
"confusion" be addressed through a more robust realignment (think
Rukun Negara) so as not to redo the logo. Particularly when all the elements in
the old and new versions are the same – the flag, the figure 1 and the words
"Malaysia" and "Negaraku" at the base of the figure 1.
There will be
monumental savings if the logo is not redesigned, hence making further savings
since the old logo is kept in use. Otherwise, imagine just the amount of
promotional stationery that would go to waste or had to be reworked. The
magnitude is daunting relative to diminishing resource allocations.
Even in the worst case scenario, if a new logo is deemed absolutely vital, why not opt for an open competition for all Malaysians. The new logo – "blending" values of inclusiveness and unity – cannot be better served and demonstrated through a nationwide participation that captures exactly the desired outcomes of inclusiveness and unity instantly.
Unfortunately, all these are now academic since another regular logo has been dished out. This time with a subliminal message on the lack of prudence and participation. Whereas it could have provided wider latitude for inclusiveness to work better through a greater sense of sharing in forging unity.
Even in the worst case scenario, if a new logo is deemed absolutely vital, why not opt for an open competition for all Malaysians. The new logo – "blending" values of inclusiveness and unity – cannot be better served and demonstrated through a nationwide participation that captures exactly the desired outcomes of inclusiveness and unity instantly.
Unfortunately, all these are now academic since another regular logo has been dished out. This time with a subliminal message on the lack of prudence and participation. Whereas it could have provided wider latitude for inclusiveness to work better through a greater sense of sharing in forging unity.
Sadly the golden
opportunity to showcase just that was myopically missed, in preference of the
"old fashioned" ways prone to rather dismal results which were proven
wasteful. All these are subtly subsumed by the new, rather dull-looking logo.
Moving forward, it
is better to return to the established sovereign insignias, at once eliminating
the redundant need for more logos. And be prudent in public spending.
Related articles
Malaysia Day
Why we should celebrate Malaysia Day
PM's massage of disunity on Malaysia Day
Steady progress should be a grad's watchword
Related articles
Malaysia Day
Why we should celebrate Malaysia Day
PM's massage of disunity on Malaysia Day
Steady progress should be a grad's watchword